Method | Diagnostic performance | Advantages and disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|
Kato-Katz (KK) Technique | Sensitivity in areas of high infection intensity: 74% to 95% Sensitivity in areas of low infection intensity: 41% to 56% Performance is dependent on the utilization of the technique. 3-sample KK had higher sensitivity than 1-slide preparations | 1. It is considered the gold standard for STH research. 2. It is easy to use in resource-lacking endemic areas. 3. It allows systematic determination of infection intensity. 4. The technique requires rapid examination of prepared slides when examining hookworms. 5. Accurate reading of the KK slides requires considerable staff training. 6. Species identification cannot be done using this technique. | |
McMaster Technique | It has higher sensitivity when compared to KK: 44% for McMaster vs. 36% for KK | 1. Easy to use in resource-lacking endemic areas It is recommended as a robust (i.e., it has an accurate multiplication factor) and accurate (i.e., it provides reliable results) alternative to KK. 2. Various floating solutions can (e.g., table salt, sugar, Sodium nitrate, or Zinc sulfate). 3. Species identification cannot be done using this technique. | Inpankaew et al. (2014a, b); Zendejas-Heredia et al. (2021); Levecke et al. (2011) |
ELISA (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) Techniques | IgG-ELISA had a sensitivity of 93.75% and specificity of 98.39 in assessing Ancylostoma caninum cutaneous larva migrans in human patients | Better diagnostic performance compared to coprological techniques The techniques are easier to perform and require less sophisticated equipment compared to molecular techniques | Adam et al. (2023) |
Molecular Techniques | qPCR had higher sensitivity than 2-slide KK preparations: 93% to 98% in qPCR vs. 32% to 34% in KK qPCR reported prevalences three times higher than those reported by KK: 21.4% in qPCR vs. 7.5% in KK | Molecular techniques have better diagnostic performance than KK These techniques can detect infections that KK misses These require expensive reagents, equipment, and staff training Species identification subsequent molecular analysis can be done using this technique |