- Original Article
- Open Access
Involvement of 2′-5′ oligoadenylate synthetase-like protein in the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis avirulent strain in macrophages
Animal Diseases volume 3, Article number: 5 (2023)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) can replicate in the macrophage by interfering with many host protein functions. While it is far from known these host proteins for controlling M. tuberculosis infection. Herein, we infected macrophages including THP-1 and Raw264.7 cells with M. tuberculosis and identified the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the interferon signaling pathway. Among them, 2′-5′ oligoadenylate synthetase-like (OASL) underwent the greatest upregulation in M. tuberculosis-infected macrophages. Knockdown of the expression of OASL attenuated M. tuberculosis survival in macrophages. Further, bioinformatics analysis revealed the potential interaction axis of OASL-TAB3- Rv0127, which was further validated by the yeast-two-hybrid (Y2H) assay and Co-IP. This interaction axis might regulate the M. tuberculosis survival and proliferation in macrophages. The study reveals a possible role of OASL during M. tuberculosis infection as a target to control its propagation.
Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), has been a leading bacterial infectious disease with high morbidity and mortality. In 2020, TB caused 1.2 million deaths (WHO 2020) and can maintain long-term survival in the host due to its escaping ability initiated by the host immune responses (Chen et al. 2021). The Interaction between M. tuberculosis and the host immune system remains elusive, pointing to the importance of this pathogen-host interaction for TB control.
Studies have reported that many cells are involved in the immune defense against M. tuberculosis, such as macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, NK cells and some atypical T cells. (Liu et al. 2017). Thus, host innate immunity plays an important role in M. tuberculosis infection (Goldberg et al. 2014). As an important part of the host immune system, macrophages are the first line of defense against M. tuberculosis infection (Zhang et al. 2019). However, M. tuberculosis can evade the immune clearance of the macrophages through various host-pathogen interaction pathways (Hmama et al. 2015). M. tuberculosis infection can alter gene expression profiles of host cells, and comparative analysis of gene expression profiles in different cells can facilitate a better understanding of the immunomodulatory effects of M. tuberculosis in macrophages.
Interferons play different roles during the invasion of M. tuberculosis. For example, the Type I IFN pathway plays a deleterious role for the host in mycobacterial infection by enhancing pathogen survival (Lai et al. 2020). However, type II interferons overcome M. tuberculosis-induced arrest of phagosome maturation, ensuring delivery of the bacterium to the phagolysosome, and leading to its elimination (Philips and Ernst 2012). IFN also acts as a host restriction factor to stimulate various host gene expression functions. As one of the IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) family, 2′-5′ oligoadenylate synthetases-like (OASL) protein was more highly expressed in active TB patients’ sera than that in latent TB patients’ sera. However, it significantly decreased 6 months after treatment, indicating changes in the type I IFN response upon therapy (Sambarey et al. 2017). During M. tuberculosis infection, OASL is highly induced in host cells (Etna et al. 2015; Leisching et al. 2017a; Zhang et al. 2019) whereas, its biological role during infection is not completely clear.
In the current study, we analyzed the gene expression profiles in the two types of macrophages after M. tuberculosis infection and found the interferon signaling pathway genes as highly enriched among differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of macrophages. Among them, the expression of OASL was significantly up-regulated in macrophages infected with M. tuberculosis, and the intracellular survival ability of M. tuberculosis was attenuated after its knockdown. Further research shows that OASL may affect the intracellular survival of M. tuberculosis through the OASL-TAB3-Rv0127 interaction axis. Collectively, the IFN signaling pathway plays a significant role during the M. tuberculosis infection, and the OASL is likely to become the potential target for developing new TB treatments.
M. tuberculosis induces differential expression of interferon and its stimulated genes in macrophages
Macrophages are the main targeted cells during M. tuberculosis infection. To further investigate the potential restriction factor of host immune cells for controlling bacterial survival, THP1, and Raw 264.7 cells were infected with M. tuberculosis for RNA-seq (Fig. 1A). The Reactome enrichment was performed for the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between M. tuberculosis-infected cells and the control groups to annotate their related pathways. Our results showed that the up-regulated DEGs were enriched in IFN signaling-related pathways (Fig. 1B and C).
The cnet plot was then generated and found that most of the up-regulated ISGs were enriched in interferon signaling-related pathways (Fig. 1D). Among these genes, it was observed that IFNB1, ISG15, IFNL1, OAS1, OAS2, OAS3, and OASL were highly induced in THP-1 cells after M. tuberculosis infection (Fig. 1E). Whereas, ISG15, MAP2K6, OAS1A, OAS2, OASL1, and OASL2 were highly induced upon M. tuberculosis infection for 3 days in Raw264.7 cells (Fig. 1F). The qRT-PCR results showed that OASL and its homologous gene OASL2 expression were significantly higher than that of other genes in THP-1 cells and Raw264.7 (Fig. 1G and H). The results suggest that OASL and homologous genes may play key regulatory roles during M. tuberculosis infection of macrophages.
OASL facilitates M. tuberculosis survival in macrophages
It has been reported that OASL plays a critical role in defining the outcome of pathogen infection (Leisching et al. 2017b). The expression of OASL was validated by western blot and we found that the expression of OASL was significantly increased at day 3 post-infection in THP-1 cells compared to uninfected cells (Fig. 2A). To figure out the role of OASL in M. tuberculosis survival in macrophages, we designed three gRNAs to interfere with the expression of OASL which became significantly decreased in THP-1 cells carrying gRNAs targeting OASL compared to gRNA control (Fig. 2B, C). To investigate whether interfering OASL expression affects M. tuberculosis survival in macrophages, intracellular bacteria counting was performed. We found that the number of M. tuberculosis per cell was significantly decreased at day 3 post-infection (Fig. 2D, E). Furthermore, the viable intracellular bacteria assay showed a significantly decreased number of viable M. tuberculosis in OASL knocked down THP-1 cells compared to the gRNA control at day 3 post-infection (Fig. 2F). Hence, our result indicated that the high expression of OASL can promote M. tuberculosis survival in THP-1 cells.
Expression profile of OASL and its interaction genes
To identify other host proteins that participate in OASL-mediated intracellular survival of M. tuberculosis, the potentially interacted proteins with OASL were analyzed using STRING. The results showed that RSAD2, MX1, MX2, IFI6, ISG15, IRF7, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, and IFI35 might interact with human OASL (Fig. 3A), and RNA seq data showed that all of them were highly expressed in M. tuberculosis-infected THP-1 cells (Fig. 3B). qRT-PCR results have also shown increased expression of ISG15, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, and MX1 in THP-1 cells after M. tuberculosis infection (Figs. 1G and 3C). For Raw 264.7 cells, MX1, MX2, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, IRF7, RSAD2, DDX58, OASL1, and USP18 were predicted to interact with OASL2 (Fig. 3D). These proteins were highly expressed in M. tuberculosis-infected Raw264.7 cells compared to the uninfected control (Fig. 3E). The expression of MX2, IFIT3, and USP18 in Raw 264.7 cells was confirmed by using qRT-PCR (Fig. 3F).
Further, we examined the expression of IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, and MX1 in both OASL knockdown THP-1 cell lines and wild-type THP-1 cells with or without M. tuberculosis infection. The results showed that IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, and MX1 expression significantly decreased in OASL knockdown THP-1 cells relative to wild-type THP-1 cells after M. tuberculosis infection (Fig. 3G-J), indicating that these genes might be involved in the OASL-mediated intracellular survival of M. tuberculosis in THP-1 cells.
OASL promotes intracellular survival of M.tuberculosis may be mediated by Rv0127
To investigate whether the high-level OASL expression promotes M. tuberculosis survival through interaction with M. tuberculosis proteins, a yeast-two-hybrid (Y2H)-based protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was applied to identify the OASL-interacting proteins in M. tuberculosis. The results showed that OASL2, the alias protein of OASL, was found to interact with transforming growth factor β-activated kinase binding protein 3 (TAB3), which interacts with Rv0127 of M. tuberculosis (Fig. 4A). Thus, we hypothesized that the OASL-TAB3-Rv0127 axis may facilitate the survival of M. tuberculosis in the host cells. To confirm this hypothesis, we performed a Y2H assay which showed TAB3 interaction with M. tuberculosis protein Rv0127 (Fig. 4B). To verify this interaction axis, we have conducted a Co-IP experiment and confirmed the interaction of OASL- TAB3 and TAB3-Rv0127 (Fig. 4C, D). In addition, the qRT-PCR results showed that the expression of TAB3 was significantly increased in THP-1 cells after infection with M. tuberculosis relative to the uninfected control, however, there is no significant difference between OASL knockdown THP-1 cells infected with M. tuberculosis and uninfected control (Fig. 4E). Therefore, there was a potential interaction between OASL-TAB3-Rv0127 (Fig. 4F).
As an intracellular pathogen, M. tuberculosis can alter the immune response to prevent itself from being cleared by the host immune cells through interaction with host proteins. Thus, host-pathogen interaction determines the outcome following infection by M. tuberculosis. M. tuberculosis was engulfed by macrophages, epithelial and endothelial cells (Baltierra-Uribe et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2015; Fine et al. 2012), and has a distinct fate, among which THP-1 cells provided M. tuberculosis the best shelter. This suggested that different cells are equipped with different defense machinery to clear invaded bacteria (Chen et al. 2021). Herein, we found that the up-regulated genes of macrophages after M. tuberculosis infection are enriched in IFN signaling-related pathways. Earlier studies also reported that M.tuberculosis infection of macrophages changed the gene expression levels of macrophages, and most of the up-regulated genes were enriched in innate immune response pathways, inflammation-related pathways, and immune regulation pathways (Lee et al. 2019; Ragno et al. 2001; Roy et al. 2018; Ehrt et al. 2001). These results are consistent with our results that the up-regulated genes are enriched in immune-related signaling pathways, which play a key role in the host-pathogen interaction process. Considering the ability of M. tuberculosis to exhibit long-term persistence and proliferation within macrophages, we hypothesized that interferon signaling might regulate M. tuberculosis survival.
Some studies have featured M. tuberculosis to elicit type I IFNs (Collins et al. 2015; Wassermann et al. 2015), whereas, the IFN signaling pathway also influenced the host immune response during M. tuberculosis infection, particularly by type I and type II (IFNs) (Lai et al. 2020). We found that IFNs and ISGs were differentially expressed in the macrophages, such as IFNB1, IFNL1, ISG15, and OASL. Among the highest upregulation of OASL, its role during M. tuberculosis infection was further studied and found that the number of intracellular bacteria was significantly decreased in knocked-down OASL THP-1 cells, indicating that OASL facilitates M. tuberculosis survival in host cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that M. tuberculosis-induced OASL would have a critical role in the modulation of the anti-mycobacterial activity of host cells. However, the number of intracellular BCGs, hypovirulent, and hypervirulent M. tuberculosis increased when OASL was knocked down in macrophages (Leisching et al. 2020). The observed results contrast with those proposed in the current study, i.e. knock-down OASL inhibits M. tuberculosis replication. The possible reason could be that different strains, time points and MOI were used. Leisching et al. used hypovirulent R1507 at the MOI of 1 and analyzed the colony formation units (CFUs) at 24 and 96 h postinfection, while our study used M.tuberculosis H37Ra strain with MOI of 10, and the data were collected at 72 h postinfection. Therefore, we speculate that the differences in the experimental parameters may lead to different results.
The STRING analysis revealed that OASL interacts with IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, MX1, and MX2, which are highly expressed in macrophages after M. tuberculosis infection, and the IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, and MX1 expressions were reduced after OASL knockdown. The IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, and MX1 genes are the important interferon-stimulating genes and are the most enriched type I interferon signaling pathways, which participate in various immune processes (Padariya et al. 2021).
The high expression of OASL could facilitate the survival of M. tuberculosis in the macrophages. However, the mechanism by which M. tuberculosis promotes the expression of OASL remains completely unclear. We speculated that OASL may interact with pathogenic proteins, thereby affecting the adaptation of pathogens to the host. Therefore, we analyzed the host-pathogen protein interaction network which was previously constructed by our team. Our PPI network results showed that OASL interacts with TAB3, which interacts with Rv0127 and this was confirmed by the Y2H assay and Co-IP experiment. Rv0127 encodes a maltose-1- phosphate synthetase (maltokinase, Mak), and it may be a potential drug target (Mendes et al. 2010). Genomic analysis studies have shown that the avirulent strain H37Ra genome is highly similar to the virulent strain H37Rv (Zheng et al. 2008), and the Ensembl Bacteria database has shown that Rv0127 exists in both virulent and avirulent strains (http://bacteria.ensembl.org/true). Rv0127 was considered essential for virulent M. tuberculosis H37Rv growth (Mendes et al. 2010). TAB3 is a binding protein of TAK1 and M. tuberculosis effector protein PtpA partially inhibited the activation of the NF-κB pathway by selectively targeting TAB3 (Wang et al. 2015). Thus, our results suggested that OASL promotes the intracellular survival of M. tuberculosis during infection by modulating multiple host signaling pathways through the OASL-TAB3-Rv0127 axis.
This study demonstrates the critical role of OASL in restricting M. tuberculosis survival in macrophages. Therefore, OASL may be a potential target for the development of host-directed therapies.
Materials and methods
Bacteria and cells culture
M. tuberculosis strain H37Ra (ATCC 25177) was cultured in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Becton Dickinson) supplemented with 0.5% glycerol, 0.05% Tween-80, and 10% oleic acid albumin dextrose catalase (OADC, Becton Dickinson). For infection, the bacterial culture optical densities at 600 nm were adjusted to achieve the required MOI and centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min to pellet the bacteria. The pellet was re-suspended in an infection medium and passed several times through an insulin syringe to disperse the bacteria. In addition, 50 μL from serially-diluted inoculation was plated to Middlebrook 7H11 agar (Becton Dickinson) to determine the number of viable bacteria (colony forming units - CFU).
The human monocytic cell line (THP-1, ATCC TIB-202) was maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and was differentiated for 24 h using a culture medium containing 40 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) before infection. Murine macrophages (Raw 264.7, ATCC TIB-71TM) were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS).
RNA-Seq library preparation and sequencing
1 × 106 of cells were seeded into a 6-well plate and incubated with M. tuberculosis (MOI = 10) for 6 h. To stop infection, the cells were washed three times with pre-warmed PBS to remove extracellular M. tuberculosis and then supplied with a fresh medium with 5% FBS containing amikacin (50 mg/ml) (referred to as day 0). The cells were lysed with 1 mL of Trizol reagent at 72 h post-infection. Lysates were mixed with 0.2 mL of chloroform centrifuge for 10 min at 12,000 g at 4 °C. 0.4 mL of aqueous layer mixed with 0.4 mL of isopropanol in a new nuclease-free Eppendorf tube. The RNA was precipitated at room temperature for 10 min and pelleted by centrifuge for 10 min at 12,000 g. Eluted RNAs were washed twice with 75% ethanol. The quality and quantity of RNAs were examined by a Nanodrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).
The libraries were generated with VAHTS Stranded mRNA-seq Library Prep Kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., China). Briefly, mRNAs were isolated using mRNA Capture Beads from 1 μg of total RNA and incubated for fragmentation at 94 °C for 8 min to get mRNAs with a length of 150 bp – 200 bp. The mRNAs were reverse-transcribed to cDNA and converted into double-stranded cDNA molecules. Following end-repairing and dA-tailing, the pair-ended sequencing adaptors were ligated to the ends of the cDNA fragments and then subjected to library amplification and purification. The purified libraries were validated and quantified using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and sequenced with the Hi-Seq X 10 instrument.
NGS data process and visualization
The RNA-seq data was processed into a reading count corresponding to each sample following Pertea et al.’s method (Pertea et al. 2016), then read count lists were merged into a matrix by an R package dpylr (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr). The read count matrix was applied to DESeq2 (Love et al. 2014) for the differential analysis, the genes which abs(foldchange) > 2 and P value < 0.05 were considered as the significant up/down-regulation genes, meanwhile, the normalized count was also exported. The gene expression differential list corresponding to each sample was merged by cells using dpylr, and the merged gene list was Reactome enriched by R package clusterProfiler (Yu et al. 2012) and ReactomePA (Yu and He 2016), then visualized through R dotplot function. The cnet plot was generated by clusterProfiler. The pathway gene list was downloaded from pathcard (https://pathcards.genecards.org/), then the count matrix was enriched by the pathcard gene list through dpylr, and the enrichment was visualized by heatmap generated heatmap. The OASL interaction genes were drawn from STRING (https://string-db.org/), these genes were used for generated a gene list, then the normalized count matrix was enriched by this list and visualized by heatmap The PPI network between M. tuberculosis and the host was withdrawn from the previous study (Yang et al. 2018) and visualized by Cytoscape (Shannon et al. 2003).
Construction of OASL knockdown cell lines
Three gRNAs used for oasl gene knockdown were designed using E-CRISPR (http://www.e-crisp.org/E-CRISP/). Each gRNA was inserted into the pHKO-dCas9 plasmid to obtain pHKO-OASL-KD-gRNA1, pHKO-OASL-KD-gRNA2, pHKO-OASL-KD-gRNA3 or pHKO-gRNA control. Lentiviruses containing gRNA were packaged by transfecting pHKO-OASL-KD-gRNAs or pHKO-gRNA control with pSPAX, pMD.2G into 293 T cells. Lentiviruses were harvested after 48 h and were used to infect THP-1 cells. Subsequently, the section with puromycin (2 μg/ml) was carried out. The expression of OASL was examined through qRT-PCR. All gRNAs and primers are shown in Table 1.
The total RNAs were extracted from cells and animal tissues using RNAiso Plus reagent (Code No. 9109, TaKaRa, Japan) and then 500 ng of RNAs were reverse transcribed to cDNA using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover Kit (Vazyme Biotech Co. Ltd., China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. SYBR Select Master Mix (TOYOBO, Japan) was used for PCR. PCRs were run on QuanStudio 6 real-time PCR system and relative expression was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method. GAPDH was used as a control. Primers are shown in Table 1.
5 × 106 THP-1 cells were seeded into a 6-well plate and differentiated with PMA for 24 h, the THP-1 cells were incubated with M. tuberculosis (MOI = 10) for 4 h. To stop infection, the cells were washed three times with pre-warmed PBS to remove extracellular M. tuberculosis and then supplied with a fresh medium with 5% FBS containing amikacin (50 mg/ml) (referred to as day 0). After 72 h, the cells were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor with a cocktail and incubated for 10 min on ice. Total proteins were quantified using a bicinchoninic acid assay (Beyotime Biotechnology, China), and 50 μg total protein was loaded. Proteins were transferred to the PVDF membrane after separation by SDS-PAGE. The membrane was blocked with fat-free milk for 1 h at room temperature after washing three times with TBST. Rabbit anti-OASL polyclonal antibody in PBST (1:2000) was added and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The HRP conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1:300) was applied to the membrane after washing three times, 5 min each time. The membrane was imaged using Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP.
Intracellular bacterial viability assay
2.0 × 105 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate and differentiated with PMA for 24 h, and the THP-1 cells were incubated with M. tuberculosis (MOI = 10) for 4 h. To stop infection, the cells were washed three times with pre-warmed PBS to remove extracellular M. tuberculosis and then supplied with a fresh medium with 5% FBS containing amikacin (50 mg/ml) (referred to as day 0). The infected cells were lysed after 72 h infection using sterile 0.1% Tween-80 in water, and viable bacilli were enumerated by serial dilution of lysates and plating on Middlebrook 7H11 agar. CFUs were counted after 3 to 4 weeks of incubation at 37 °C an incubator. All the infections were performed in triplicate.
For confocal microscopy, 2.0 × 105 cells (THP-1-GFP-sgRNA, THP-1-GFP-OASL-gRNA1, THP-1-GFP-OASL-gRNA2, and THP-1-GFP-OASL-gRNA3, respectively) per well were seeded onto coverslips in a 24-well plate and differentiated for 24 h with PMA. RFP-H37Ra (MOI = 10) was applied to the wells for 4 h infection at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The cells were washed three times with pre-warmed PBS to remove extracellular M. tuberculosis, and supplied with a fresh medium with 5% FBS containing amikacin (50 μg/mL). The medium was changed every 2 days to avoid serum starvation-induced autophagy. The infected cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min on day 3 post-infection and the cells were washed three times with pre-warmed PBS. The specimens were mounted onto microscope slides using a prolonged antifade reagent. Images were obtained with an Olympus confocal laser microscope system equipped with FV10 ASW Imaging Software (Version 4.2, Olympus). The number of bacteria from 150 cells was analyzed. All infections were performed in triplicate.
The full length of Rv0127 and TAB3 were restriction cloned into pmBD and pmAD plasmids of the GAL4 Y2H system (Clontech, Mountain-view, CA, USA) respectively as described (Yang et al. 2018). pmAD-TAB3 was transformed into yeast strain Y187, and plated on SD/−T selective plates. pmBD-Rv0127 was transformed into yeast strain GoldY2H, and plated on SD/−L selective plates. GoldY2H cells harboring Rv0127 plasmid and Y187 cells harboring TAB3 plasmid were hybridized and selected on SD/Leu − Trp − His− Ade − selective plates. The yeast strains were transformed with the respective constructs and transformants were selected on minimal media lacking leucine and tryptophan (−LT). Interactions were assessed by growing trans-formants in liquid culture at 30 °C and spotting on SD/ Leu − Trp − His− Ade − selective plates. Plates were imaged after 3–5 d growth at 30 °C.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with pCDNA3.1-V5-TAB3 and pCAGGS-Flag-Rv0127, pCAGGS-Flag-OASL2. After 36 h, cells were washed with PBS, followed by western blotting and immunoprecipitation with cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Nonidet P-40) with the addition of 1% protease inhibitors. Cocktail (Sigma, P8340). After 30 min incubation on ice, whole cell lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove debris. Cell lysates were incubated with V5-tag mAb magnetic agarose beads (MBL, M180–10) overnight at 4 °C. Immune complex samples were centrifuged, washed 3 times with cell lysis buffer, and then boiled in SDS loading buffer for 5–10 min. After 12% separation by SDS-PAGE, equal amounts of protein were electro-blotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked with 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST) and 5% nonfat dry milk in triple buffered saline for 2 hr. at room temperature, followed by overnight incubation with primary antibodies (DDDDK-Tag Rabbit mAb, AE092, ABclonal; V5-Tag mAb, AE089, ABclonal). After washing 3 times with TBST, diluted with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Immuno-reactive protein bands were visualized by Western ECL clear substrate (BioRad, 1,705,060).
Numerical data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 7.0 (La Jolla, CA) software from three independent experiments shown as mean ± SEM. Evaluation of the significance of differences between groups was performed by using one-way ANOVA or student t-test.
Availability of data and materials
The data sets used in this study are available in the following databases: Host RNA-Seq data: Gene Expression Omnibus GSE125907 and M. tuberculosis RNA-Seq data: Gene Expression Omnibus GSE162200.
Baltierra-Uribe, S.L., M.D. Garcia-Vasquez, N.S. Castrejon-Jimenez, M.P. Estrella-Pinon, J. Luna-Herrera, and B.E. Garcia-Perez. 2014. Mycobacteria entry and trafficking into endothelial cells. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 60 (9): 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2014-0087.
Chen, X., X. Cao, Y. Lei, A. Reheman, W. Zhou, B. Yang, W. Zhang, W. Xu, S. Dong, R. Tyagi, Z.F. Fu, and G. Cao. 2021. Distinct persistence fate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in various types of cells. mSystems 6 (4): e0078321. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00783-21.
Chen, X., K. Sakamoto, F.D. Quinn, H.C. Chen, and Z.F. Fu. 2015. Lack of intracellular replication of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis BCG caused by delivering bacilli to lysosomes in murine brain microvascular endothelial cells. Oncotarget 6 (32): 32456–32467. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5932.
Collins, A.C., H. Cai, T. Li, L.H. Franco, X.D. Li, V.R. Nair, C.R. Scharn, C.E. Stamm, B. Levine, Z.J. Chen, and M.U. Shiloh. 2015. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is an innate immune DNA sensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cell Host & Microbe 17 (6): 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.005.
Ehrt, Sabine, D. Schnappinger, Stefan Bekiranov, Jörg Drenkow, Shuangping Shi, Thomas R. Gingeras, Terry Gaasterland, Gary Schoolnik, and Carl Nathan. 2001. Reprogramming of the macrophage transcriptome in response to interferon-gamma and Mycobacterium tuberculosis signaling roles of nitric oxide synthase2 and phagocyte oxidase. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 194: 1123–1139.
Etna, M.P., E. Giacomini, M. Pardini, M. Severa, D. Bottai, M. Cruciani, F. Rizzo, R. Calogero, R. Brosch, and E.M. Coccia. 2015. Impact of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RD1-locus on human primary dendritic cell immune functions. Scientific Reports 5: 17078. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17078.
Fine, K.L., M.G. Metcalfe, E. White, M. Virji, R.K. Karls, and F.D. Quinn. 2012. Involvement of the autophagy pathway in trafficking of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli through cultured human type II epithelial cells. Cellular Microbiology 14 (9): 1402–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01804.x.
Goldberg, M.F., N.K. Saini, and S.A. Porcelli. 2014. Evasion of innate and adaptive immunity by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology Spectrum 2 (5). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MGM2-0005-2013.
Hmama, Z., S. Pena-Diaz, S. Joseph, and Y. Av-Gay. 2015. Immunoevasion and immunosuppression of the macrophage by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Immunological Reviews 264 (1): 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12268.
Lai, Y., G.H. Babunovic, L. Cui, P.C. Dedon, J.G. Doench, S.M. Fortune, and T.K. Lu. 2020. Illuminating host-mycobacterial interactions with genome-wide CRISPR knockout and CRISPRi screens. Cell Systems 11 (3): 239–251.e237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2020.08.010.
Lee, J., S.G. Lee, K.K. Kim, Y.J. Lim, J.A. Choi, S.N. Cho, C. Park, and C.H. Song. 2019. Characterisation of genes differentially expressed in macrophages by virulent and attenuated Mycobacterium tuberculosis through RNA-Seq analysis. Scientific Reports 9 (1): 4027. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40814-0.
Leisching, G., A. Ali, V. Cole, and B. Baker. 2020. 2′-5′-Oligoadenylate synthetase-like protein inhibits intracellular M. tuberculosis replication and promotes proinflammatory cytokine secretion. Molecular Immunology 118: 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2019.12.004.
Leisching, G., R.D. Pietersen, C. van Heerden, P. van Helden, I. Wiid, and B. Baker. 2017a. RNAseq reveals hypervirulence-specific host responses to M. tuberculosis infection. Virulence 8 (6): 848–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2016.1250994.
Leisching, G., I. Wiid, and B. Baker. 2017b. The association of OASL and type I interferons in the pathogenesis and survival of intracellular replicating bacterial species. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 7: 196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00196.
Liu, C.H., H. Liu, and B. Ge. 2017. Innate immunity in tuberculosis: Host defense vs pathogen evasion. Cellular & Molecular Immunology 14 (12): 963–975. https://doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2017.88.
Love, M.I., W. Huber, and S. Anders. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 15 (12): 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.
Mendes, V., A. Maranha, P. Lamosa, M.S. da Costa, and N. Empadinhas. 2010. Biochemical characterization of the maltokinase from Mycobacterium bovis BCG. BMC Biochemistry 11: 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-11-21.
Padariya, M., A. Sznarkowska, S. Kote, M. Gomez-Herranz, S. Mikac, M. Pilch, J. Alfaro, R. Fahraeus, T. Hupp, and U. Kalathiya. 2021. Functional interfaces, biological pathways, and regulations of interferon-related DNA damage resistance signature (IRDS) genes. Biomolecules 11 (5): 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050622.
Pertea, M., D. Kim, G.M. Pertea, J.T. Leek, and S.L. Salzberg. 2016. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nature Protocols 11 (9): 1650–1667. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.095.
Philips, J.A., and J.D. Ernst. 2012. Tuberculosis pathogenesis and immunity. Annual Review of Pathology 7: 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-132458.
Ragno, S., M. Romano, S. Howell, D.J. Pappin, P.J. Jenner, and M.J. Colston. 2001. Changes in gene expression in macrophages infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A combined transcriptomic and proteomic approach. Immunology 104 (1): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0019-2805.2001.01274.x.
Roy, S., S. Schmeier, B. Kaczkowski, E. Arner, T. Alam, M. Ozturk, O. Tamgue, S.P. Parihar, H. Kawaji, M. Itoh, T. Lassmann, P. Carninci, Y. Hayashizaki, A.R.R. Forrest, R. Guler, V.B. Bajic, F. Brombacher, and H. Suzuki. 2018. Transcriptional landscape of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in macrophages. Scientific Reports 8 (1): 6758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24509-6.
Sambarey, A., A. Devaprasad, A. Mohan, A. Ahmed, S. Nayak, S. Swaminathan, G. D'Souza, A. Jesuraj, C. Dhar, S. Babu, A. Vyakarnam, and N. Chandra. 2017. Unbiased identification of blood-based biomarkers for pulmonary tuberculosis by modeling and mining molecular interaction networks. Ebiomedicine 15: 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.12.009.
Shannon, P., A. Markiel, O. Ozier, N.S. Baliga, J.T. Wang, D. Ramage, N. Amin, B. Schwikowski, and T. Ideker. 2003. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research 13 (11): 2498–2504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303.
Wang, J., B.X. Li, P.P. Ge, J. Li, Q. Wang, G.F. Gao, X.B. Qiu, and C.H. Liu. 2015. Mycobacterium tuberculosis suppresses innate immunity by coopting the host ubiquitin system. Nature Immunology 16 (3): 237–U189. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3096.
Wassermann, R., M.F. Gulen, C. Sala, S.G. Perin, Y. Lou, J. Rybniker, J.L. Schmid-Burgk, T. Schmidt, V. Hornung, S.T. Cole, and A. Ablasser. 2015. Mycobacterium tuberculosis differentially activates cGAS- and inflammasome-dependent intracellular immune responses through ESX-1. Cell Host & Microbe 17 (6): 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.003.
WHO. 2020. Global tuberculosis report.
Yang, F., Y. Lei, M. Zhou, Q. Yao, Y. Han, X. Wu, W. Zhong, C. Zhu, W. Xu, R. Tao, X. Chen, D. Lin, K. Rahman, R. Tyagi, Z. Habib, S. Xiao, D. Wang, Y. Yu, H. Chen, Z. Fu, and G. Cao. 2018. Development and application of a recombination-based library versus library high- throughput yeast two-hybrid (RLL-Y2H) screening system. Nucleic Acids Research 46 (3): e17. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1173.
Yu, G., and Q.Y. He. 2016. ReactomePA: An R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization. Molecular BioSystems 12 (2): 477–479. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5mb00663e.
Yu, G., L.G. Wang, Y. Han, and Q.Y. He. 2012. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16 (5): 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118.
Zhang, Y.W., Y. Lin, H.Y. Yu, R.N. Tian, and F. Li. 2019. Characteristic genes in THP-1 derived macrophages infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain identified by integrating bioinformatics methods. International Journal of Molecular Medicine 44 (4): 1243–1254. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2019.4293.
Zheng, H., L. Lu, B. Wang, S. Pu, X. Zhang, G. Zhu, W. Shi, L. Zhang, H. Wang, S. Wang, G. Zhao, and Y. Zhang. 2008. Genetic basis of virulence attenuation revealed by comparative genomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Ra versus H37Rv. PLoS One 3 (6): e2375. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002375.
Confocal microscopy was conducted in and supported by the State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology at Huazhong Agricultural University.
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31602061, U21A20259, 31872470), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFD1800401).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study does not involve animal ethics.
Consent for publication
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Reheman, A., Cao, X., Wang, Y. et al. Involvement of 2′-5′ oligoadenylate synthetase-like protein in the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis avirulent strain in macrophages. Animal Diseases 3, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44149-023-00068-w
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- Interferon stimulated genes